Upcoming Article on PM Best Practices
Thursday, May 27th, 2010Watch this spot
Watch this spot
Looking at the Apollo program, we can see a very vivid (and real life) example of how the Triple Constraint works in a large, very expensive, politically charged and highly visible project.
Project: Put a man on the moon
“First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him back safely to the earth.” (President John F. Kennedy, Joint Session of Congress on May 25, 1961)
Scope: Landing a man on the Moon AND returning him safely to Earth
Time: Before the decade is out
Cost: Whatever Congress will approve

What are the immutable constraints here?
(more…)
In part 1 of this series, we defined the P3MO as an acronym for “Project, Program, and Portfolio Management Office.” It’s based on the concept of a PMO (project management office) elevated to cover project portfolio management as well as project and program management. In part 2 we will discuss the relationship between the three components of the P3MO: project management, program management and portfolio management.
Project management ensures the successful completion of initiatives and their associated deliverables within the time, scope and cost parameters agreed to by the end-users of the product, service or result. The project manager manages stakeholder expectations and communication between all team members and stakeholders.
Program management provides overall leadership and vision to the project management process. The program manager is responsible for delivering value to the community of stakeholders.
Portfolio management aligns the portfolio of projects and other work with the objectives of the organization and ensures that the work delivers value to the business.
Portfolios are made up of projects, programs and other work. (Other work includes on-going operations, ad-hoc activities and other “business as usual” work.)
(more…)
My experience at PMI’s 2009 North America Congress was excellent and, as always, well worth the trip. I met and exchanged ideas with some of the top practitioners, researchers, consultants and authors in the project management industry.
There is no doubt about it. The benefits realized from a sound and well-organized project management methodology based on globally recognized project management standards have been well established. These benefits cannot be overstated. Organizations that make full use of the power of a project-focused environment gain a competitive advantage over those organizations that do not leverage this power. They also gain a competitive advantage over those organizations that publish an “official” project management standard but make little or no attempt to implement it or to make it a part of organizational policy. *
One of the hot project management topics at the Congress was the P3MO (project, program, portfolio management office). Another was that of “value driven project management”, the topic of Harold Kerzner’s closing session speech and the topic of his new book, co-authored with Frank P. Saladis. An integrated project portfolio management environment (i.e., a P3MO) with a focus on driving business value represents the state-of-the-profession thinking right now. I can personally confirm that this approach is beginning to emerge out in the field. At my most recent client, a global life insurance company doing business on three continents, my colleagues and I recommended exactly this approach and delivered guidelines for achieving this. **
Sphere: Related Content